Reality on ground is diametrically opposite
There was a comment about why only retired central government officers are preferred for Administrative Member in CAT, and not from other eminent fields, including public sectors. The number of applicants is large and generally the selection for the CAT goes through a channel of apparent and elaborate transparency. Be that as it may, officers from IAS, IPS, IRS, central services, etc are generally preferred because of their long exposure and experience in service matters and handling the peculiar rules and provisions in CCS rules in the centre and the states. These are not directly relevant in many PSUs who have their own CCS rules. The purpose of CAT was to reduce the burden of service matter litigations on regular civil and appeal courts. Whether this objective has been met is a moot point, but the principle of the Government, as always, is beyond a pale of criticism and is fundamentally sound. That the reality on ground is diametrically opposite is a different matter altogether.
Srinivasan
Date with RTI
An excellent decision !!!!! and a much needed one. You have been covering the government news for long and can appreciate the importance of 56 J. The current government has been on a spree of throwing people out of service. I am not going into whether such an action is right or wrong. But, the point is it should be legal and justifiable before an independent body who can look into the legality of the action. It is here that the action is questionable in many cases. The officer is compulsorily retired behind his back on the basis of whims and fancies of those in power. The least which is required is that they be given a chance to challenge the action taken against them for which the officer would need the documents on the basis of which he /she has been removed. This order would give strengthen the hands of those who have been wronged. Great work Whispers.
Shrikant M
Srinivasan
Date with RTI
An excellent decision !!!!! and a much needed one. You have been covering the government news for long and can appreciate the importance of 56 J. The current government has been on a spree of throwing people out of service. I am not going into whether such an action is right or wrong. But, the point is it should be legal and justifiable before an independent body who can look into the legality of the action. It is here that the action is questionable in many cases. The officer is compulsorily retired behind his back on the basis of whims and fancies of those in power. The least which is required is that they be given a chance to challenge the action taken against them for which the officer would need the documents on the basis of which he /she has been removed. This order would give strengthen the hands of those who have been wronged. Great work Whispers.
Shrikant M