Whispers Forum

We the Nationalist people of India stand strongly with Gyanesh Kumar...We support Gyanesh Kumar...We support our Nationalist
Government..
Ashish Rawat

IT cell backed page
Literally no one other than your IT-Cell backed page is doing all these speculations.
Atindriya Chakrabarty

Communist new address is Congress
All communists nowadays join the congress party
D Mehta

A wise understanding for Hindus Protesting all over the country under various banners should deeply understand that the existence of Hinduism is more important today & only the ruling BJP can control this sensitive issue. We have seen in the past decade the upliftment of Hinduism in our country, many examples can be drawn including the making of multiple Mandir Corridors, Jagrans & Jamming sessions on Indian culture all over the country. Today Major countries of the world are under threat of Conversion & they don’t have any way out to save their religion & values. This is the time to stay united & save the country from hidden enemies. Government should create a ministry for resolving all issues related to Protest & Demonstrations by Gen-Z.

Vivek Dhawan

90 percent of bureaucrats are corrupt. And most who defend have allegations against them.

Mradul Ashok

Election machinery

How dumb does one have to be to defend the election machinery when what is being criticized is the way people were removed from electoral rolls. What use are these robust safeguards of when the electoral rolls themselves are allegedly rigged? Idk what these bureaucrats want, are they not satisfied with everything they sucked from the common man while in service that they have to do this now to suck more?

Vivek

Protests are part of the normal democratic process. Delhi being the Capital of the country, there will be frequent protests. The existing place Jantar Mantar is not only small but is surrounded by busy commercial establishments and offices

I suggest the National Stadium near India Gate would be a suitable place for protests. It is an enclosed space and crowd management would be easy. It is near Parliament House and a delegation of protestors can go easily to meet /hand over their grievances to the Government.

Government should consider this option.

S. Gopal

Just wait for another month. The scamgressis, SP and AAP would be at loggerheads with each other. If Pappu manages to get popular, he would obviously demand more UP seats. Maybe even break off the UP alliance. And WRT Punjab, AAP wouldn't want to lose the elections against Scamgressis. So where's the UNITY? Each of them have their own personal agendas. So the question isn't about BJP but about scoring their own brownie points for the elections ahead. Abh samjha?
A visitor
AI in the IT department?
What will happen if manpower in the Income Tax department is replaced by AI on a large scale? Automated processes and AI might well be a game changer.
Vijay Kumar

The respondent informed that the RTI Application was filed by Ms. Saroj Gupta and as the information was sought regarding report of auditing pertaining to grant of said 3rd MACP of Sh. Mangat Goyal, the same was denied under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act. It was counter argued by Sh. Mangat Goyal that the Appellant is his wife who had filed the RTI Application on his behalf seeking internal audit report related to him and denial of the information u/s 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act is wrong. The respondent further stated that the report is a 10 years old record and is not traceable in their official records. Considering the fact that Shri Mangat Goyal represented the Appellant during the hearing, the CIC ruled that the plea of exemption under Section 8(1)(j) does not survive. The CIC directed to examine the instant RTI Application and furnish a revised reply within four weeks. In the event, no records on such points are available in their office, the fact should be categorically reflected in the revised reply of the PIO.
Comments
It is preferable for an individual to file an application directly under the RTI Act instead of asking a friend or a relative to seek information on one’s behalf.
Citation: Saroj Gupta v. Sports Authority of India, Second Appeal No. CIC/SAOIN/A/2024/643474; Date of Decision: 22.01.2026
Dr. Anuradha Verma (dranuradhaverma@yahoo.co.in) is an accomplished Right to Information (RTI) consultant who has worked for organisations such as IIM Indore, IIM Mumbai, IIM Visakhapatnam and ICAI. She is the co-author of two widely acclaimed books, PIO's Guide to RTI and Right to Information – Law and Practice. She conducts training programmes, workshops, and capacity-building sessions on the RTI Act. She also provides consultancy services on RTI implementation, compliance, and third-party audits. Her weekly article has been published on this website since 2008. Other articles and publications can be accessed on the RTI Foundation website at: www.rtifoundationofindia.com