Whispers Forum — 7 Dec 2021
DEBATE (1)
Not true. CMs like Shivraj Singh and Raman Singh have proved that they can work hours and hours for their respective states’
Hari Ranjan
Parliament disruption
Iin an article in Times of India of Dec 6th (today) Mr.Pavan Varma has stated that "the House of Commons in England has not been adjourned for a single day. In our country we are fast reaching the situation where not a single day passes when the House is not adjourned." There is a simple solution to this problem :
In the prelunch session, say from 10AM to 2PM , members can participate in serious discussions. All the members need not be present. Every party can depute Members who are well versed with the subject matter to be discussed and they can collectively decide on the issues. The post lunch session, say from 3PM onwards, can be devoted to shouting and other innovative forms of disruptions. This can go as long as members wish and their will be no need to adjourn. Thus both objective will be settled- doing serious business and displaying displeasure. I request some influential readers to bring this to the notice of the House leaders.
Raghavan
Not true. CMs like Shivraj Singh and Raman Singh have proved that they can work hours and hours for their respective states’
Hari Ranjan
Parliament disruption
Iin an article in Times of India of Dec 6th (today) Mr.Pavan Varma has stated that "the House of Commons in England has not been adjourned for a single day. In our country we are fast reaching the situation where not a single day passes when the House is not adjourned." There is a simple solution to this problem :
In the prelunch session, say from 10AM to 2PM , members can participate in serious discussions. All the members need not be present. Every party can depute Members who are well versed with the subject matter to be discussed and they can collectively decide on the issues. The post lunch session, say from 3PM onwards, can be devoted to shouting and other innovative forms of disruptions. This can go as long as members wish and their will be no need to adjourn. Thus both objective will be settled- doing serious business and displaying displeasure. I request some influential readers to bring this to the notice of the House leaders.
Raghavan